Prediction of Paul Mcnamee vs Ross Case Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Mcnamee vs R. Case

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ross Case

AUS

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcnamee 1 - 2 Case

They have played 7 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Ross Case winning 5. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Ross Case was at the Melbourne Indoor, 04-10-1982, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcnamee	1
Case	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R4) Melbourne Indoor(10-04-82)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Ross Case

(R1) Wimbledon(06-21-76)

Stats

Ross Case

Paul Mcnamee

(R2) Adelaide(01-17-72)

Stats

Ross Case

Paul Mcnamee

P. Mcnamee vs R. Case H2H Profile

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Case
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.74% (260-233)	Career Total W/L	52.57% (317-286)
0	Grass	2
1	Indoor	0
4	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Mcnamee vs R. Case Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ross Case has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Mcnamee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ross Case has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ross Case has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ross Case winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39). Ross Case has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 56% (W/L 15/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 90/87).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ross Case has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Paul Mcnamee winning 1 times and Ross Case being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Ross Case winning 5.
The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Ross Case was at the Melbourne Indoor, 04-10-1982, Round: R4, Surface: Carpet, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Mcnamee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ross Case has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ross Case has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ross Case has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Mcnamee vs Ross Case Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Mcnamee vs R. Case H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Case
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	5
33	Games Won	41
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Case Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Spring CH - 14-05-1984
R3 Vijay AmritrajV. Amritraj	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
San Luis Potosi CH - 16-04-1984
R3 Randy DruzR. Druz	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
SF Javier ContrerasJ. Contreras	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
R4 Mike BarrM. Barr	W	4-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
QF Charles Buzz StrodeC. Buzz	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee vs R. Case Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Case
52.74% (260/233)	YTD Win/Loss	52.57% (317/286)
51.88% (662/614)	Sets Win/Loss	51.28% (803/763)
50.55% (6201/6067)	Games Win/Loss	50.36% (7571/7464)
47.30% (35/39)	Hard Win/Loss	50.85% (90/87)
53.16% (126/111)	Clay Win/Loss	51.08% (71/68)
51.43% (36/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	41.11% (37/53)
56.25% (63/49)	Grass Win/Loss	59.77% (104/70)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
527.71	Average Opponent Rank	533.57
53.57% (45/39)	Slam W/L	53.09% (43/38)
48.00% (12/13)	Masters W/L	30.00% (3/7)
64.71% (11/6)	Cups W/L	60.00% (3/2)
50.57% (178/174)	Main Tour W/L	51.77% (248/231)
93.33% (14/1)	Challenger W/L	71.43% (20/8)
53% (204/387)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (252/480)
54% (55/102)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	51% (59/115)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (11/21)
52% (74/143)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (109/201)
86% (258/221)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (317/252)
14% (258/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (317/65)
17% (234/40)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (280/60)